This was another one of those days where we were missing some of our group members, so things went by pretty quickly. Stephanie and I basically went through the procedure step by step; we decided to formulate our questions and then read the selection that was about voice. It was surprising how both our questions were indeed about writing in a way that seemed like an authentic representation of our voices. A question I asked about my piece was whether I had successfully created an illusion of dialogue in my writing. Stephanie responded that I did this, and that the structure of the dialogue actually helped give my thoughts more structure. A question that Stephanie asked about her piece was actually about the use of two voices- the voice of her as a child experiencing something, and the voice of reflection about that experience. She told me that the piece wasn't finished, but wanted to know which "voice " could be utilized more effectively. I thought that she actually did a good job of starting the piece with the younger voice to draw the reader in and going on to explain what she thinks with the older voice.